Personal project · Applied AI

Health Insights turns WHO health data into a conversation, giving grounded answers to the people who set policy.

Millions of records. One conversation.

The data that should drive health policy usually sits in files nobody has time to read.

Effective public health decision-making depends on the timely and accurate analysis of vast and complex health data. Policymakers, healthcare administrators, NGO directors and researchers often struggle to access and interpret this data efficiently, which leads to misinformed decisions. Health Insights addresses this with a domain-specific chatbot: stakeholders query WHO health indicators in natural language and receive context-aware, accurate insights without needing technical expertise.


  1. Ask

    A stakeholder asks a question in natural language. No dashboards and no query languages.

  2. Retrieve

    A Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline retrieves the relevant WHO health indicators as grounding context.

  3. Answer

    A fine-tuned LLaMA-2 model responds with a context-aware, accurate insight.


General-purpose language models guess, and in public health a guess is a liability. The system therefore grounds every answer in retrieved data. A Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline finds the relevant records first, and the model only reasons over what it was handed.

The model itself is LLaMA-2, fine-tuned with QLoRA, a parameter-efficient technique that adapts the model to the health domain on modest hardware. Task-based user studies showed improved efficiency, clarity and confidence compared to traditional manual methods.

Mean rating by dimension

percentage of maximum score

88%
Ease of use
84%
Conversation
88%
Effectiveness

What evaluators agreed with

percentage of maximum score

86%
Faster than manual
90%
Data made clear
90%
Would use again
90%
would use it again · 4.5/5
88%
overall satisfaction · 4.4/5
100%
task success rate
15
evaluators, 5 task types
Human evaluation of the deployed system. Percentages are converted from ratings on a 5 point scale by health professionals, researchers and students in policy fields.